HOME
TOPICS
SEARCH
ABOUT ME
MAIL

 
GuestPC runs Windows on an OS X Mac quite well.
 technofile
Al Fasoldt's reviews and commentaries, continuously available online since 1983

T h e   R o a d   L e s s   T r a v e l e d
After Microsoft's Virtual PC, are there other ways to run Windows on a Mac? Yes, and one of them is worth trying


Nov. 23, 2005


By Al Fasoldt
Copyright © 2005, Al Fasoldt
Copyright © 2005, The Post-Standard

   Running Windows on a Mac is easy. You simply install the Virtual PC emulator and then install Windows. But this costs a lot of money — $130 for a version of Virtual PC that requires your own copy of Windows.
   Isn't there a cheaper way?
   That's the question I asked myself when I started looking for a Windows emulator that didn't have the heavy hand of Microsoft imprinted on it. I found that there is, indeed, a a cheaper way — two of them, in fact. There are at least two other PC emulators that run on an OS X Macintosh. One of them is only $24, and the other is $70.
   Let's start with the $24 package, called iEmulator. I tested version 1.7.7 of this software, and found that the price is the only advantage it has. iEmulator is sold with extravagant claims about speed. But I would say it's dog-slow on my dual-processor G4 — except that no dog I know is so lethargic. Let's just say it's so slow you'd never want to use it for anything serious.
   iEmulator comes from www.iemulator.com. Save the $24 for a dinner out on the town.
   A much faster emulator — still quite slow, but easily able to run most Windows software without panting hard — comes from www.lismoresystems.com. It's Guest PC. At $69.99, it's not much more than half the cost of Microsoft's emulator, and it runs almost as fast. A real plus is the way Guest PC handles almost all the chores of installing Windows; Guest PC asks you a few questions before you start installing your copy of Windows, and then handles all the interaction with the Windows installer itself. You can simply walk away.
   Or maybe you can simply go away for the weekend. Installation times for both emulators took much longer than I was accustomed to with Virtual PC. I tried out many different versions of Windows on Guest PC and found that the best way to handle an installation was to get it started and then drive off to work.
   But that's not a big problem. Once Windows was installed, it ran quite well on the Guest PC "computer" inside my Mac. Virtual PC is clearly faster, but I was amazed that Guest PC, coming from a company without the huge resources of Microsoft, could produce an emulator that challenged Virtual PC so effectively.
   I also found that network connections worked better on my Guest PC Windows installation than they did on my Virtual PC Windows computer. Internet connections worked from the start without any configuration. After installing Firefox under Windows, I was able to surf the Web easily on the Windows side of my Mac.
   Guest PC includes a drag-and-drop way of getting files and folders from one system to the other. This worked well most of the time. And configuring each emulated PC — you can run many at the same time — was easier than it is with Virtual PC.
   Unfortunately, Guest PC knows nothing about USB. There's no way to have Windows use a USB device on its own. (Virtual PC handles this nicely. That's one of the strengths of VPC.) You can print to a USB printer, but Guest PC simply directs things through your Mac. If need to print from Windows, Guest PC might not be for you.
   Any emulator is going to be slow. But if you have to run Windows software now and then, Guest PC is an inexpensive way to do it. It will do the job. But be sure to run good antivirus and antispyware software on the emulated Windows PC. An emulated Windows computer is still a vulnerable system.