HOME
TOPICS
ABOUT ME
MAIL
My wife and other daughter now want to get a
Mac to replace our Windows PC.
|
|
technofile
Al Fasoldt's reviews and
commentaries, continuously available online since
1983
T h e R o a
d L e s s T r a v e l e
d
Readers' thoughts: Serendipities of Mac ownership and
some shared responsibilites
Sept. 24, 2003
By Al Fasoldt
Copyright © 2003, Al Fasoldt
Copyright © 2003, The Post-Standard
Readers keep my job interesting. I have
two opinions to share with you this week.
The first is from John Thomas, who wrote
to me asking for help with Windows problems in July and
ended up buying an Apple iBook for his daughter to take to
college.
My daughter's iBook arrived Friday.
I rushed home from work so I could play with it as much
as I could. Wow, simply a thing of beauty. You're
right; as soon as you get past the differences in
operating systems, it does seem easy.
Here is one little neat advantage I
already found. My youngest daughter's cheerleading
team went to Disney the last two years. Two years ago,
one of the coaches put all their photos on a CD. My PC
would not recognize the JPG files on the CD (sometimes
even locking up, trying to read it!). As an experiment, I
put the CD in the iBook, and wouldn't you know it,
iPhoto opened them right up! So here we have a CD burned
on a Windows PC that wouldn't work on another Windows
PC, but was just fine on a modern Mac.
I talked to my daughter at college
yesterday. Once again all the computer guys had to go
around the dorms and tell everybody to shut off their
computers and not hook up to the Internet because of the
virus. When they saw my daughter was using an iBook, they
told her she didn't have to -- because she had
"one of the cool ones".
And yes, my wife and other daughter
now want to get a Mac to replace our Windows PC.
Reader Tom McClive offers an insight into
the responsibility software makers ought to bear in
response to a column I wrote about "clueless"
Windows users.
I get more discouraged by the software
manufacturers who don't get it, who give us
unprotected systems or software that takes over our
computers and changes things to its liking.
Part of the question is the philosophy
of an operating system. Just what is it supposed to be,
to include? Apple has raised the bar pretty high, and
Microsoft's case about whether Internet Explorer is
an integral part of the operating system complicates
things.
Years ago, few would argue that a
browser must be included in an OS; now people take it for
granted that it will be. Now we ask the same questions
about things like firewalls.
People should be able to buy and run a
computer expecting it to work properly and safely without
having to make too many modifications or additions.
Today, someone who buys an XP machine must find or buy
and install a firewall, a script blocker and a virus
checker at minimum. They must also constantly check for
updates. There are other things to manage, such as popup
windows, cookies, and general hard disk maintenance.
Furthermore, they must educate
themselves about those fake pass-it-on urban legend
e-mails, learn something about e-mail etiquette and learn
to handle the spam and worms that they'll inevitably
receive in their inbox.
Is this normal? Should people have to
do this, be expected to do all this? No one should ever
expect to buy and use a computer without having to do
some self-education, but they shouldn't have to do so
much to merely protect themselves and their identity.
All excerpts are used by permission of
the authors.
|
|